Williams v. Pincombe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversible error to admit evidence of plaintiff's receipt of welfare benefits, even for the purpose of impeaching motive to work
• reversible error to admit evidence of plaintiff’s receipt of welfare benefits, even for the purpose of impeaching motive to work
• “Such evidence had the tendency to confuse and mislead the jury on the issue of the defendant’s liability and its admission by the trial court constituted error prejudicial to the plaintiff.”
• \Such evidence [of welfare benefits] had the tendency to confuse and mislead the jury on the issue of the defendant's liability and its admission by the trial court constituted error prejudicial to the plaintiff.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).