Williams v. Pierson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendant unions were entitled to a good 1 faith defense against claims that they had unconstitutionally deducted fees from public 2 employees’ paychecks because they followed applicable laws allowing for such 3 deductions at the time
• applying the reasoning from the court's former order dismissing the claims against the state defendants as moot to the claims against the union defendant
• noting the Ninth Circuit did not require an analysis of analogous common law torts in Clement but suggesting the Second Circuit in Pinsky did
• “Although the precise contours of the defense have not been clearly defined by the Supreme Court, circuit courts, including the Ninth Circuit, have acknowledged its general contours of equity [sic] and fairness.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).