Williams v. Parks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an employee’s knowledge of the employer’s business strategy and other confidential information support application of a restrictive covenant
• denying motion to dismiss because plaintiff alleged defendant forwarded confidential information to his personal email and revealed such information to a competitor
• failed to allege facts demonstrating reasonably certain business opportunities . . . were lost as a result of the defendant’s misconduct
• “[T]his is not a case where the non-compete clause effective prohibits the employee from working in virtually any capacity for a competitor.”
• “Although the absence of a geographical limitation must be considered in evaluating whether a non-compete provision is enforceable, the lack of such a limitation does not, in itself, render the non-compete provision unenforceable.” (citing Simmons, 544 S.E.2d at 678)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).