Skip to main content
· 7/26/1991

Williams v. Norfolk Southern Ry. Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 767 F. Supp. 756
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10567
  • 1991 WL 136899

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing “operational activities” as “services the employer would ordinarily perform, but has chosen, for some reason to contract out to others”
  • Although other modes were impractical, plaintiffs “decision to use Amtrak did not ‘stem more directly from a specific requirement of [the] job or a specific understanding as to [plain tiffs] mode of [transportation]”.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ellis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.