Williams v. Naidu

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that specific testimony by the two defendant physicians in malpractice action that they had never been sued before was improper and warranted retrial
• Doctors testimony that they had never been sued before inadmissable as it is tantamount to saying that they had never been negligent as medical practitioners, from which it is inferable that they were not negligent in treating appellant.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).