Williams v. Midland Acres, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating the court must find “if such allegations and inferences are true, a reasonable jury could find the reliance justifiable based upon clear and convincing evidence.”
• “‘[I]nferences [that] are strained, forced, or contrary to reason’” are “properly disregarded as ‘arbitrary inferences.’” (quoting Coward, 295 Va. at 359)
• “All of the different parts of an agreement must be viewed together, i.e., as a whole, and each part interpreted in the light of all of the other parts.” (quotation omitted)
• “All of the different parts of an agreement must be viewed together, i.e., as a whole, and each part interpreted in the light of all of the other parts.” (citation omitted)
• finding reliance unjustifiable as a matter of law
• finding reliance unjustifiable as a matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).