· 10/25/2000
Williams v. Matesanz
Citations
- 230 F.3d 421
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 26795
- 2000 WL 1577064
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- overruled on other grounds by McCambridqe v. Hall, 303 F.3d 24, 37 (1st Cir. 2002)
- “A state court decision that applies the correct legal rule but reaches an independent outcome on different facts cannot be deemed to run at cross purposes to Supreme Court precedent.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Selya, Bownes, Lipez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.