Skip to main content
· 10/25/2000

Williams v. Matesanz

Citations

  • 230 F.3d 421
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 26795
  • 2000 WL 1577064

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • overruled on other grounds by McCambridqe v. Hall, 303 F.3d 24, 37 (1st Cir. 2002)
  • “A state court decision that applies the correct legal rule but reaches an independent outcome on different facts cannot be deemed to run at cross purposes to Supreme Court precedent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Bownes, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.