District of Columbia· 11/18/2011
Williams v. Johnson
Citations
- 278 F.R.D. 1
- 81 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 311
- 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133281
- 2011 WL 5822721
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not provide for automatic or 10] blanket stays of discovery when a potentially dispositive motion is pending”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-06-24· cited 3,106×
- Thomas v. Cook County Sheriff's DepartmentSeventh Circuit· 2010-05-03· cited 671×
- C. F. Bean Corp. v. Dragados, S. A.Supreme Court· 1987-01-27· cited 183×
- Richard C. CHRISTIE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantSeventh Circuit· 1986-03-06· cited 58×
- United States v. Tchibassa, ArturD.C. Circuit· 2006-07-07· cited 45×
- Elsie M. Lear v. The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesEighth Circuit· 1986-09-04· cited 31×
- Anthony Teong-Chan Gaw Rossana W. Gaw v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueD.C. Circuit· 1995-01-31· cited 19×
- Katherine E. Griman, Administratrix of the Estate of Frank J. Griman, Deceased v. Florence Makousky and Lois WeaverSeventh Circuit· 1996-02-07· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.