District of Columbia· 4/27/2006
Williams v. Johanns
Citations
- 235 F.R.D. 116
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23709
- 2006 WL 1122615
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- referring to the original and amended complaint was an inadequate response to interrogatories
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Facciola
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- McFadden v. Ballard, Spahr, Andrews, & Ingersoll, LLPDistrict of Columbia· 2007-06-29· cited 14×
- Williams v. JohannsD.C. Circuit· 2007-09-04· cited 7×
- Williams v. JohannsDistrict of Columbia· 2007-07-26· cited 4×
- Anchondo v. Anderson, Crenshaw, & Associates, L.L.C.D. New Mexico· 2009-03-16· cited 4×
- Escamilla v. NuyenDistrict of Columbia· 2015-07-14
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.