Supreme Court· 3/30/1942

Williams v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.

Citations

315 U.S. 386
62 S. Ct. 659
86 L. Ed. 914
1942 U.S. LEXIS 1050

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

allowing suits by employees on behalf of “him or themselves and other employees similarly situated” (quoting FLSA, 29 U.S.C. § 216(b))
permitting the opposite arrangement, where gratuities in the form of tips are included in employee wages pursuant to an agreement between the parties
permitting the opposite arrangement, where gratuities in the form of tips are included in employee wages pursuant to an agreement between the parties
in FLSA case, employees implicitly agreed to new compensation arrangement by continuing to work under the arrangement, even though they were protesting the new arrangement
“The prohibitions of § 6 against change of wages or conditions pending bargaining and those of § 2, Seventh, are aimed at preventing changes in conditions previously fixed by collective bargaining agreements.”
\Independent individual contracts are not affected by the Act. . . . The crucial S 6 is phrased so as to leave no doubt that only agreements reached after collective bargaining are covered\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reed, Black, Roberts, Douglas, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

120 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Williams v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.