Williams v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing suits by employees on behalf of “him or themselves and other employees similarly situated” (quoting FLSA, 29 U.S.C. § 216(b))
• permitting the opposite arrangement, where gratuities in the form of tips are included in employee wages pursuant to an agreement between the parties
• permitting the opposite arrangement, where gratuities in the form of tips are included in employee wages pursuant to an agreement between the parties
• in FLSA case, employees implicitly agreed to new compensation arrangement by continuing to work under the arrangement, even though they were protesting the new arrangement
• “The prohibitions of § 6 against change of wages or conditions pending bargaining and those of § 2, Seventh, are aimed at preventing changes in conditions previously fixed by collective bargaining agreements.”
• \Independent individual contracts are not affected by the Act. . . . The crucial S 6 is phrased so as to leave no doubt that only agreements reached after collective bargaining are covered\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Williams v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Williams v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.
  Fifth Circuit· 1941-03-04· cited 10×
• Williams v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.
  S.D. Florida· 1940-10-21· cited 2×
• Williams v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.
  Supreme Court· 1941-10-13