Williams v. Huff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the court in remanding a case back to the trial court for a determination, suggested that the the age (15) and education of petitioner would provide an inference that there was not an intelligent waiver
• the court in remanding a case back to the trial court for a determination, suggested that the the age (15) and education of petitioner would provide an inference that there was not an intelligent waiver

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Moore v. Michigan
  Supreme Court· 1957-12-09· cited 493×
• National Mutual Insurance v. Tidewater Transfer Co.
  Supreme Court· 1949-10-10· cited 328×
• David R. Jones v. United States of America, Willie L. Short, Jr. v. United States of America, Arthur L. Jones v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1964-07-16· cited 90×
• People v. Witenski
  New York Court of Appeals· 1965-04-22· cited 52×
• United States ex rel. Miner v. Erickson
  Eighth Circuit· 1970-06-05· cited 25×
• United States Ex Rel. Brown v. Fay
  S.D. New York· 1965-06-01· cited 23×
• United States Ex Rel. Darcy v. Handy
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 1951-05-17· cited 18×
• Application of Estrada
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1965-06-16· cited 9×
• Phillips v. Smith
  S.D. Georgia· 1969-06-04· cited 6×
• People v. Amos
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1964-04-10· cited 3×
• Jackson v. Sanford
  N.D. Georgia· 1947-05-09· cited 2×
• Gay v. Smith
  S.D. Georgia· 1968-11-29· cited 2×
• United States v. Erickson
  Eighth Circuit· 1970-06-05