Skip to main content
· 3/10/1952

Williams v. Hildebrand

Citations

  • 220 Ark. 202
  • 247 S.W.2d 356
  • 1952 Ark. LEXIS 677

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • delinquency petition need not inform juvenile he is being charged with designated felony and could be sentenced to restrictive custody
  • delinquency petition need not inform juvenile he is being charged with designated felony and could be sentenced to restrictive custody
  • \[D]ue process does not require that the juvenile be informed either in writing or in the delinquency petition that he is being charged with a designated felony act which may require that he be sentenced to restrictive custody.\
  • “[D]ue process does not require that the juvenile be informed either in writing or in the delinquency petition that he is being charged with a designated felony act which may require that he be sentenced to restrictive custody.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smiti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.