Skip to main content
· 3/23/1970

Williams v. Follette

Citations

  • 397 U.S. 997

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding district court should have abstained where Alleghany had filed action in federal court instead of appealing state administrative decision to North Dakota state courts
  • noting that the Supreme Court left the question open and deciding that the proceedings are unitary
  • applying Younger to a commissioner’s denial of an application because the actions are judicial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.