Williams v. Flintkote Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• broad statement that witness used products at issue “all over” the plant is not sufficient to link a specific product to the plaintiff
• summary judgment to defendant was appropriate when testimony established only that its asbestos-containing products were used somewhere within two plants but not that plaintiffs were in proximity to those products

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Butler v. Union Carbide Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-06-15· cited 41×
• Adamson v. General Electric Co.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-03-22· cited 12×
• Aldridge v. Overstreet
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-06-19· cited 1×
• KEVIN SINYARD v. PIEDMONT HOSPITAL, INC.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2022-03-10
• Leisa Davis v. John Crane, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2019-10-29

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lau's Corp., Inc. v. Haskins
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1991-06-27· cited 2,024×
• Hoffman v. AC&S, INC.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-03-14· cited 34×
• John Crane, Inc. v. Wommack
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-06-27· cited 27×
• Graff v. McReynolds & Associates, P.C.-Profit Sharing Plan
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-02-12· cited 3×