Skip to main content
· 5/19/1989

Williams v. First Alabama Bank

Citations

  • 545 So. 2d 26
  • 1989 WL 71305

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • knowledge of two prior robberies at same bank insufficient to determine that robbery of ATM customer was foreseeable
  • summary judgment affirmed against bank customer robbed while using an automatic teller machine
  • \when two similar robberies had occurred in the previous two months\
  • evidence of two robberies during the approximate one-month period preceding the robbery of the plaintiff held to be insufficient, as a matter of law, to establish that a duty to protect existed on the part of the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steagall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.