Williams v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that court must accept Board’s findings of fact if supported by substantial evidence
• noting that court must accept Board's findings of fact if supported by substantial evidence
• “Insofar as the [agency’s] legal conclusions are concerned, we must defer to its interpretation of the statute which it administers . . . so long as that interpretation is not plainly wrong or inconsistent with the legislative purpose.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).