Skip to main content
· 2/21/2023

Williams v. Department of Health and Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • overruling objection to Report and Recommendation when objecting party failed to “point to any specific evidence or develop any particularized arguments identifying discrete factual issues that are in dispute”
  • \A court confronted with an unopposed summary judgment motion is still required to test the undisputed facts in the crucible of the applicable law in order to ascertain whether summary judgment is warranted.\ (citation modified)
  • “district courts possess wide latitude in the exercise of their case-management authority”
  • “To ensure the fair and prompt adjudication of cases, a district court must be able to manage its docket effectively and efficiently” and district courts are afforded “a wide margin of discretion in the performance of their case-management functions.”
  • “To ensure the fair and prompt adjudication of cases, a district court must be able to manage its docket effectively and efficiently” and district courts are afforded “a wide margin of discretion in the performance of their case-management functions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Rudolph Contreras

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.