Skip to main content

Williams v. Davis

Citations

  • 373 S.W.3d 381
  • 2009 Ark. App. 850
  • 2009 Ark. App. LEXIS 1033

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the inferior court cannot vary the appellate court’s mandate; examine it for any other purpose than execution; give any other relief; or review for eiror any matte decided on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Agree, Gladwin, Hart, Pittman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.