Skip to main content
· 1/9/2012

Williams v. Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for Dc

Citations

  • 840 F. Supp. 2d 192
  • 2012 WL 35554
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2280

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the pro se plaintiff “diligently pursued his claim” by “refil[ing] his complaint within three or four days of receiving notice” that his IFP motion had been denied “by contacting — on his own accord — the Clerk’s Office to check on the status of his motion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Richard W. Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.