Williams v. Court of Common Pleas Philadelphia County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• choosing not to address an association’s standing when its arguments were identical to those of a registered elector with standing
• \[Alny ambiguity in the meaning of 'open mining [in the titles] is clarified by its use in the summary....\
• “The trial court determines whether the acts at issue are 17 sufficiently outrageous to state a claim for relief; however, if reasonable minds could differ 18 about whether the conduct is sufficiently outrageous, the issue should be decided by a 19 jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).