Williams v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• While accused’s guilt or innocence must be determined from the facts of the case, and he cannot be affected by the prevalence of crime, it is within the limits of legitimate argument to insist upon the jury doing its duty for the purpose of preventing bloodshed and crime.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cantrell v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2009-06-25· cited 25×
• Ray v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1919-06-17· cited 11×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Truax v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1912-10-08· cited 24×
• Meredith v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1912-04-30· cited 13×