Williams v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 85 Va. 607
- 8 S.E. 470
- 1889 Va. LEXIS 72
Syllabus
<p>1. Criminal Proceedings—Instructio?is after jziry retired.—Without instructions case is submitted, and after being out several hours, jury ask for instructions as to “reasonable doubt,” and the court fully and correctly instructs them, but excludes other instructions offered by prisoner ;</p> <p>Held :</p> <p>No error, as the offer came too late.</p> <p>2. Idem—Murder—Evidence certified—Case■ at bar.—The evidence here certified and considered under the rule as to demurrers to the evidence ;</p> <p>Held :</p> <p>Sufficient to warrant the verdict of guilty as charged in the indictment.</p> <p>3. Idem—Former acquittal.—A plea that when prisoner’s associate was tried for the same offence, prisoner was a fugitive from justice, and that associate was acquitted, and that therefore prisoner was acquitted ;</p> <p>Held:</p> <p>Bad.</p> <p>4. Idem—furors—Competency.—A juror testifies that he had read the evidence on the trial of the prisoner’s associate, and formed an opinion, but not a positive one, and could give the prisoner a fair trial on the evidence;</p> <p>Held :</p> <p>He is competent.</p> <p>5. Idem—Homicide—Evidence—Res gestee —Bullet taken from deceased’s body of same kind as that carried by pistol habitually carried by prisoner, and burglar’s nippers identified as prisoner’s and found near scene of homicide, are admissible as part of the res gestee.</p> <p>6. Idem—Evidence—Indictment for other offences.—Record of indictment in another State against prisoner at time of homicide is admissible to show motive for resisting arrest.</p> <p>7. Idem—Evasion of arrest.—Evidence that after the homicide prisoner evaded arrest, and after arrest broke jail and resisted re-arrest, is competent.</p> <p>8. Idem—Jury—By-standers.—Under Code 1887, § 4019, where persons from the by-standers are ordered to be summoned to complete the panel on trial of a felony, the list is not required to be signed by the judge.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing the accused’s “desperate resistance . . . showed a strong determination to resist arrest at extreme hazards” and thereby raised an inference of guilt
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lacy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Marlowe v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1986-08-05· cited 158×
- Jones v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1952-10-13· cited 59×
- McLean v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1999-07-27· cited 43×
- Taylor v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1893-07-06· cited 43×
- Turman v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia· 2008-10-31· cited 40×
- Berkeley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1994-11-29· cited 31×
- Hampton v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1950-03-13· cited 16×
- State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court· 1905-12-04· cited 12×
- Duty v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1923-09-20· cited 10×
- Witt v. MerricksSupreme Court of Virginia· 1969-06-16· cited 8×
- Hebner v. SullivanSupreme Court of Virginia· 1952-10-13· cited 5×
- United States v. MullenE.D. Virginia· 1967-12-28· cited 2×
- Astruc v. Star Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York· 1910-11-28· cited 1×
- McLean v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1998-12-08
- Jordan v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1874-12-15
- Womack v. CircleSupreme Court of Virginia· 1877-09-15
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.