Williams v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Commonwealth’s need for evidence relevant to decision whether to admit defendant’s mug shots
• Commonwealth's need for evidence relevant to decision whether to admit defendant's mug shots
• given prejudice posed by use of booking photos at trial, they are inadmissible unless “ ‘(1) the prosecution [had] a demonstrable need to introduce the photographs; (2) the photos themselves, if shown to the jury, [did] not imply that the defendant had a criminal record; and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Walker
  Washington Supreme Court· 2015-01-22· cited 120×
• Davis v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2004-11-18· cited 72×
• Maxie v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2002-08-22· cited 48×
• Robinson v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1996-04-25· cited 39×
• Cuzick v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2009-01-22· cited 34×
• Brooks v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2003-09-18· cited 29×
• Miller v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2011-12-22· cited 16×
• Finnell v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2009-10-29· cited 15×
• Furnish v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2008-11-26· cited 9×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Charles A. Harrington
  Second Circuit· 1973-12-28· cited 106×
• Boone v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1989-11-30· cited 29×
• Redd v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1979-12-07· cited 14×