Skip to main content

Williams v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 412 S.E.2d 202
  • 13 Va. App. 393
  • 8 Va. Law Rep. 1547
  • 1991 Va. App. LEXIS 310

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a defendant may be found liable of malicious or unlawful wounding for a blow with the bare fist even though the first is not regarded as a dangerous weapon
  • presuming an intent to kill where the accused used only his fists based on circumstances such as the lack of provocation and severity of the injuries inflicted
  • “Malice inheres in the intentional doing of a wrongful act without legal justification or excuse.” (emphasis added)
  • defendant struck the victim “four or five times with his fists,” causing significant injuries that required extensive medical treatment
  • even if not reflected in the record, a trial court has the ability to observe an attacker and his victim’s relative sizes when considering intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Willis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.