Williams v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding insufficient mere “proof of fingerprints on a television set that had been displayed in a showroom” accessible to the public
• finding that “proof of fingerprints -6- on a television set that had been displayed in a showroom” and accessible to the public failed to “exclude a reasonable hypothesis that the prints were left at a time other than the time when the crime was committed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Turner v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1977-06-10· cited 86×
• Commonwealth v. Cichy
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-04-03· cited 37×
• Commonwealth v. Dolan
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-05-15· cited 7×
• Dewayne Oliver Winslow v. Commonwealth of Virginia
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2014-12-23· cited 2×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Avent v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1968-12-06· cited 58×