Skip to main content

Williams v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 702 S.E.2d 260
  • 57 Va. App. 341
  • 2010 Va. App. LEXIS 481

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Rule 5A:18 to hold that the appellant waived his argument by failing to obtain a trial court ruling on it
  • appellant waived his assignment of error on appeal because he did not obtain a ruling from the trial court on his pretrial motion to -9- dismiss
  • “Due process requires the prosecution ‘to prove beyond a reasonable doubt every fact - 10 - necessary to constitute the crime charged.’” (quoting Mullaney v. Wilbur, 421 U.S. 684, 685 (1975))
  • “Because [mother] did not obtain a ruling from the trial court . . . ‘there is no ruling for [this Court] to review’ on appeal, and h[er] argument is waived under Rule 5A:18.” (quoting Fisher v. Commonwealth, 16 Va. App. 447, 454 (1993))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frank

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.