Skip to main content
· 5/2/1985

Williams v. City of Seattle

Citations

  • 607 F. Supp. 714
  • 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20195

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • criticizing Punton-, employee has no substantive property interests in procedural rules alone
  • Loudermill satisfied when public employee received letter detailing allegations against him and informing him of the opportunity to respond
  • IIS investigation by the Seattle Police Department satisfied pretermination due process requirements
  • demoted police sergeant not entitled to damages for violation of predeprivation rights because letter to the officer fully explained the allegations against him and their source and informed him of the opportunity and obligation to respond

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coughenor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.