Williams v. Cingular Wireless

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Cingular Wireless had no duty not to furnish a cell phone to a third party who later caused a car accident while using the phone
• finding insufficient relationship between telephone company and driver of a car to impose duty for negligence in motor vehicle accident
• stating, “[w]e sustain the trial court’s ruling if we can affirm on any basis found in the record”
• “Although it is foreseeable that cellular phone use while driving may contribute to a car accident, it is not foreseeable that the sale of a phone to a customer will necessarily result in a car accident.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).