Skip to main content
· 8/18/1995

Williams v. Chicago Osteopathic Health Systems

Citations

  • 654 N.E.2d 613
  • 211 Ill. Dec. 151
  • 274 Ill. App. 3d 1039

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing differing elements and standard of proof between medical malpractice and fraud
  • recognizing differing elements and standard of proof between medical malpractice and fraud.
  • distinguishing the \weighing” of evidence done by a jury from the \disciplined evaluation” performed by a court ruling on a directed verdict
  • “in ruling on a motion for a directed verdict, courts must evaluate the relative strength of the nonmovant’s evidence in the context of the entire record at the time the motion is presented” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Brien

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.