· 10/26/1914
Williams v. Cantwell
Citations
- 114 Ark. 542
- 170 S.W. 250
- 1914 Ark. LEXIS 646
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The agency’s errors could not be more serious insofar as it acted unlawfully, which is more than sufficient reason to vacate the rules.”
- “the absence of a statutory definition does not render a word ambiguous”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kirby, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.