Skip to main content
· 10/26/1914

Williams v. Cantwell

Citations

  • 114 Ark. 542
  • 170 S.W. 250
  • 1914 Ark. LEXIS 646

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The agency’s errors could not be more serious insofar as it acted unlawfully, which is more than sufficient reason to vacate the rules.”
  • “the absence of a statutory definition does not render a word ambiguous”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kirby, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.