Skip to main content
· 1/2/1915

Williams v. Cambria & Indiana Railroad

Citations

  • 247 Pa. 172
  • 93 A. 337
  • 1915 Pa. LEXIS 801

Syllabus

<p>Practice, G. P. — Jurors—Alleged' disqualification — Continuance —Proper refusal.</p> <p>A juror is not disqualified to serve in condemnation proceedings by reason of the fact that his grandfather has brought an action against another railroad company for loss resulting from the condemnation of land in another section of the county, and the refusal of a continuance applied for because of the alleged disqualification of such juror is a proper exercise of judicial discretion, particularly where the application is not made until after the jury has viewed the premises, and the balance of the panel has been discharged.</p>

Judges: Brown, Elkin, Fell, Mestrezat, Potter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.