· 9/20/1924
Williams v. Brownstein
Citations
- 1 F.2d 470
- 1924 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 994
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- construing Criminal Rule 32.1, which allows a defendant to withdraw his plea after sentencing “to correct manifest injustice.”
- \It is unnecessary for the State to demonstrate knowing waivers of rights when the appellee has not even raised these constitutional issues.\
- the manifest-injustice standard “seeks to avoid the possibility of a defendant pleading guilty to test the weight of potential punishment”
- the strict post-sentence withdrawal rule “seeks to avoid the possibility of a defendant pleading guilty to test the weight of potential punishment”
- credibility, good faith, and weight are subjects for the trial court when ruling on the withdrawal motion
- credibility, good faith, and weight are subjects for the trial court when ruling on the withdrawal motion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hale
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.