Williams v. Bowman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that 14 this list of factors “does not exhaust the possibilities” and comparing the factors in Decker 15 Coal Co. v. Commonwealth Edison Co., 805 F.2d 834, 843 (9th Cir.1986
• noting that this list of factors “does not exhaust the possibilities”
• noting that this list of factors “does not 27 exhaust the possibilities” and highlighting differing combinations of factors used by courts in A. Forum Selection Clause 1 The moving defendants move upon an Independent Contractor Operating Agreement 2 (“Operating Agreement”
• noting deference to the plaintiff’s chosen venue is “substantially reduced” where the forum lacks a significant connection to the facts giving rise to the litigation
• noting deference to the plaintiff’s chosen venue is “substantially reduced” where the forum lacks a significant connection to the facts giving rise to the litigation
• finding local interest favors district where 11 dispute “grew out [of] events and practices” in that district

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).