Skip to main content

Williams v. Booker

Citations

  • 712 S.E.2d 617
  • 310 Ga. App. 209

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that a conclusion that is equally as likely as its opposite “is speculation rather than a reasonable inference from the facts”
  • “a reasonable inference cannot be based on mere conjecture or probability, or on evidence that is too uncertain or speculative”
  • “Absent a factual basis linking Williams’ alcohol addiction or use to the claimed act of medical malpractice, the evidence is inadmissible because it is both irrelevant and highly prejudicial”
  • physician and his medical practice sought interlocutory review to appeal the denial of their motions for partial summary judgment on the issue of whether the physician had a duty to inform a patient about his alcohol addiction
  • physician and his medical practice sought interlocutory review to appeal the denial of their motions for partial summary judgment on the issue of whether the physician had a duty to inform a patient about his alcohol addiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ellington, Miller, Doyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Williams v. Booker

8 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.