Skip to main content
· 2/1/1968

Williams v. Blalock

Citations

  • 280 F. Supp. 298
  • 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8909

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that it was absurd for defendant 20 to lack knowledge about a product critical to the company’s success
  • “Although Thomas was not himself the author of the book, 21 the Court finds that his cooperation with its publication subjects him to becoming a public 22 figure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dalton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.