Williams v. Arndt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that unclean hands defense did not apply to copyright infringement claim where defendants could not “prove that any omission [in copyright application] was an intentional, knowing or purposeful concealment”
• commodities trading booklet distributed to eleven preferred customers who requested it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).