Skip to main content
· 6/26/1986

Williams v. Amax Chemical Corp.

Citations

  • 720 P.2d 1234
  • 104 N.M. 293

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • sagacity of making changes in workers’ compensation statutes, or rights created thereunder, generally held to be beyond the province of the court
  • claim for retaliatory discharge will not lie where employee discharged for exercising rights under the Worker’s Compensation Act
  • wisdom of making changes in workers’ compensation statutes, or rights thereunder, rests with legislature
  • Workmen's Compensation Act does not provide compensable retaliatory discharge claim
  • Workmen’s Compensation Act does not provide compensable retaliatory discharge claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Federici, Riordan, Stowers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.