Williams v. Agama Systems Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• After trial, Court found that, given differences in particle size specification between compared products, a Canadian product was not likely to be representative of the 25 accused product
• “We [affirm] with the understanding that the court’s inequitable conduct finding was based on the conduct of Dr. Peter Grebow and Mr. Richard Burgoon, while acting within the course and scope of their employment or as offi cers and/or employees of Cephalon.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).