Williams v. Agama Systems, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that extension of new value need not be directly connected to the preceding preference in order to shelter it
• holding that extension of new value need not be directly connected to the preceding preference in order to shelter it
• noting that the parties “engaged in a series of credit transactions” wherein the creditor shipped goods to debtor prior to receiving payment, but holding that the new value provided was in the form of “goods”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• G.H. Leidenheimer Baking Co. v. Sharp
  Fifth Circuit· 2006-02-08· cited 40×
• Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of the Estate of CCG 1355, Inc. v. CRST, Inc. (In Re CCG 1355, Inc.)
  D. New Jersey· 2002-04-16· cited 14×
• Phoenix Restaurant Group, Inc. v. Ajilon Professional Staffing LLC (In Re Phoenix Restaurant Group, Inc.)
  M.D. Tennessee· 2004-12-01· cited 12×
• Gonzales v. DPI Food Products Co. (In Re Furrs Supermarkets, Inc.)
  D. New Mexico· 2003-08-04· cited 12×
• Moser v. Bank of Tyler (In re Loggins)
  E.D. Texas· 2014-04-21· cited 11×
• Phoenix Restaurant Group, Inc. v. Proficient Food Co. (In Re Phoenix Restaurant Group, Inc.)
  M.D. Tennessee· 2007-08-08· cited 10×
• Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Contempri Homes, Inc. Ex Rel. Ch. 11 Estate of Contempri Homes, Inc. v. Wholesale (In Re Contempri Homes, Inc.)
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 2001-10-17· cited 9×
• Dots, LLC v. Milberg Factors, Inc. (In re Dots, LLC.)
  D. New Jersey· 2017-01-10· cited 9×
• Peltz v. Application Engineering Group, Inc. (In Re Bridge Information System, Inc.)
  E.D. Missouri· 2002-12-23· cited 7×
• Claybrook v. Pizza Hut, Inc. (In Re Discovery Zone, Inc.)
  D. Delaware· 2003-10-03· cited 7×
• Strauss v. Janesville Products (In Re Acoustiseal, Inc.)
  W.D. Missouri· 2004-11-24· cited 4×
• Chiasson v. Strachan Shipping Co. (In Re Massan Shipping Industries, Inc.)
  E.D. Louisiana· 2001-11-07· cited 4×
• Intercontinental Polymers, Inc. v. Equistar Chemicals, LP (In Re Intercontinental Polymers, Inc.)
  E.D. Tennessee· 2005-03-31· cited 3×
• Friede Goldman Halter, Inc. v. Aircomfort, Inc. (In Re Consolidated FGH Liquidating Trust)
  S.D. Mississippi· 2008-04-01· cited 2×
• Gouveia v. Seneca Petroleum Co. (In Re Globe Building Materials, Inc.)
  N.D. Indiana· 2005-11-22· cited 2×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Barnhill v. Johnson
  Supreme Court· 1992-03-25· cited 682×
• Thomas W. Garland, Inc. v. Union Electric Co. (In Re Thomas W. Garland, Inc.)
  E.D. Missouri· 1982-05-05· cited 79×
• In Re New York City Shoes, Inc., Debtor. New York City Shoes, Inc. v. Bentley International, Inc.
  Third Circuit· 1989-07-12· cited 78×
• Laker v. Vallette (In Re Toyota of Jefferson, Inc.)
  Fifth Circuit· 1994-02-28· cited 50×
• Leathers v. Prime Leather Finishes Co.
  D. Maine· 1984-05-29· cited 39×
• Kroh Bros. Development Co. v. Continental Construction Engineers, Inc. (In re Kroh Bros. Development Co.)
  Eighth Circuit· 1991-04-18· cited 15×
• In Re Irfm, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1995-04-05· cited 8×
• Barr v. White Oak State Bank
  Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 1984-08-30· cited 7×
• Samar Fashions, Inc. v. Matisse International, Inc. (In Re Samar Fashions, Inc.)
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1990-01-09· cited 6×

Other cases named Williams v. Agama Systems, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Williams v. Agama Systems Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 2003-11-20