Williams, Phillips & Co. v. Benton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “[w]hether evidence is constitutionally required to be admitted is reviewed on a case-by-case basis,” and holding that past sexual behavior evidence was constitutionally required when it was probative of the defense theory of mistaken identity
• admission of “rape shield” evidence to show that another committed the offenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).