WILLIAMS, KEITH v. v. WILLIAMS, TAWNY B.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing “an apparent circuit split as to whether private settlements relating to FLSA claims require district court review”
• recognizing “an apparent circuit split as to whether private settlements relating to FLSA claims require district court review” but declining to address the issue
• assuming without deciding that a “district court has a duty to exercise some level of review” of private FLSA settlement agreements
• enforcing a fee award negotiated as part of the settlement notwithstanding a high fee-to-recovery ratio where the lodestar far exceeded the request
• “[W]e recognize an apparent circuit split as to whether private settlements relating to FLSA claims require district court review.”
• “[W]e recognize an apparent circuit split as to whether private settlements relating to FLSA claims require district court review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).