Skip to main content
· 4/9/1985

Williams Ex Rel. Williams v. United States

Citations

  • 608 F. Supp. 269

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying motion for leave to increase ad damnum based on expert report, where plaintiffs did not allege any reason as to why the psychologist could not have examined infant plaintiff prior to presenting administrative claim
  • to be allowed to amend, plaintiffs must show that the evidence could not have reasonably been discovered by the time they presented their claim to the United States
  • to be allowed to amend, plaintiffs must show that the evidence could not reasonably have been discovered at the time they presented their claim to the United States

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Paine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.