· 4/9/1985
Williams Ex Rel. Williams v. United States
Citations
- 608 F. Supp. 269
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denying motion for leave to increase ad damnum based on expert report, where plaintiffs did not allege any reason as to why the psychologist could not have examined infant plaintiff prior to presenting administrative claim
- to be allowed to amend, plaintiffs must show that the evidence could not have reasonably been discovered by the time they presented their claim to the United States
- to be allowed to amend, plaintiffs must show that the evidence could not reasonably have been discovered at the time they presented their claim to the United States
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Paine
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.