Williams ex rel. Pike County v. Stallard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that defendants were put on sufficient notice where \the gravamen of Adobe's allegations ... are that all the Defendants infringed on Adobe's trademarks and copyrights\
• finding lumping of defendants together permissible where “gravamen” of 22 claim was all defendants infringed trademarks
• applying purposeful 21 direction analysis to UCL claims related to trademark issues
• finding similar allegations, standing alone, sufficient to plead 11 likelihood of confusion
• Decision recognizes defendants sold infringing products in the 28 forum state, but still relies on Washington Shoe test to find express aiming
• “A complaint which lumps together multiple defendants in one broad allegation fails to satisfy the notice requirement of Rule 8(a)(2).” (citation modified)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).