Williams' Admr. v. Southern Railway

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that confidential documents, information, and inventions were not property subject to a conversion claim
• denying leave to amend as futile because the claim was barred by statue of limitations
• dismissing claim where “allegations are inconsistent with the pleading of ‘actual knowledge’”
• “An unfair competition claim can only survive dismissal of a duplicative misappropriation claim if the two rest on different factual predicates.”
• “because [the plaintiff’s UCL and CLRA claims] rest upon 5 this unified theory, all of [the] claims must ‘rise or fall together’”
• knowledge of fiduciary duties cannot be inferred from knowledge of a business relationship or employment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).