William Wayne Picco v. Global Marine Drilling Company, and Crosbie Offshore Services, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a dismissal without prejudice on the grounds of forum non conveniens after an automatic stay was issued in a bankruptcy proceeding did not have prospective application within the meaning of Rule 60(b)(5
• finding res judicata of the district court’s decision to dismiss a case where it took such action despite being aware of an automatic stay that apparently prohibited its jurisdiction
• \A court's determination of its own jurisdiction is subject to the principles of res judicata ; it generally may not be challenged in a collateral proceeding.\
• “The only arguably prospective effect of the ... dismissal is that it precludes relitigation of the issues decided, which clearly is not enough.”
• “The automatic stay of the bankruptcy court does not divest all other courts of jurisdiction to hear every claim that is in any way related to the bankruptcy proceeding.”
• \The automatic stay of the bankruptcy court does not divest all other courts of jurisdiction to hear every claim that is in any way related to the bankruptcy proceeding.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).