William T. Divane, Jr. v. Krull Electric Co., Inc., and Lee Electric Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that it is an abuse of discretion to base a decision on “an erroneous conclusion of law”
• noting that it is an abuse of discretion to base a decision on “an erroneous conclusion of law”
• noting that it is an abuse of discretion to base a decision on “an erroneous conclusion of law”
• explaining that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) allows district courts to correct their own errors, thus avoiding “unnecessary appellate procedures” (quoting Moro v. Shell Oil Co., 91 F.3d 872, 876 (7th Cir. 1996))
• explaining that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) allows district courts to correct their own errors, thus avoiding “unnecessary appel- late procedures” (quoting Moro v. Shell Oil Co., 91 F.3d 872, 876 (7th Cir. 1996))
• explaining that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) allows district courts to correct their own errors, thus avoiding “unnecessary appel- late procedures” (quoting Moro v. Shell Oil Co., 91 F.3d 872, 876 (7th Cir. 1996))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).