Skip to main content
· 4/10/1998

William Staples v. City of Milwaukee

Citations

  • 142 F.3d 383
  • 13 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1527
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 7344
  • 1998 WL 166191

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that oral notice contemporaneous with the opportunity to reply may, in some circumst ances, satisfy due process
  • emphasizing that plaintiff “had no idea his job was on the line”
  • noting that a “few hours warning” could satisfy
  • pre-termination hearing does not require the incidents of a full, trial-type hearing
  • pre-termination hearing does not require the incidents of a full, trial-type hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Diane, Flaum, Ripple, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.