William St. Peters v. Shell Oil Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming district court granting of Rule 52 motion where plaintiff had failed to prove the existence of enforceable contract
• use of word “may” makes language discretionary, not mandatory, and certainly not promissory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).