Skip to main content
· 6/18/1987

William SORBA, Appellant, v. PENNSYLVANIA DRILLING COMPANY, INC.

Citations

  • 821 F.2d 200
  • 44 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 54
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 7690
  • 43 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 37,158

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing the elements of a prima facie case in the ADEA context
  • discussing the elements of a prima facie case in the ADEA context
  • plaintiff must introduce evidence of inconsistencies in the employer’s stated reasons for discharge which reasonably could support an inference of discrimination
  • rebutting charge of poor performance
  • rebutting charge of poor performance
  • rebutting charge of poor performance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gibbons, Mansmann, Katz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.