William Solomon Lewis v. Mark Anthony Aguirre

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding plain error in sentence when trial court treated conspiracy as Class II felony rather than Class IA felony pursuant to statute
• when defendant challenges sentence imposed by district court as excessive, State may identify any plain sentencing errors in its responsive brief
• sentence imposed within statutory limits will not be disturbed on appeal absent abuse of discretion by trial court
• declined to consider ineffective assistance of counsel claim due to failure to comply with Mrza, which had been released 3 months prior to filing of appellant’s brief
• declined to consider ineffective assistance of counsel claim due to failure to comply with Mrza, which had been released 3 months prior to filing of appellant’s brief
• relevant question for appellate court is whether, after viewing evidence in light most favorable to prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found essential elements of crime beyond reasonable doubt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).