Skip to main content
· 9/13/1994

William Smith v. John Richert, Judge, Pulaski Circuit Court Pamela Carter, Attorney General, State of Indiana

Citations

  • 35 F.3d 300
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 25235
  • 1994 WL 498644

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that the Required Records Doctrine did not apply in part because \[n]othing in the subpoena identifies the records sought as records required by the state's agricultural statutes to be kept\
  • determining that the Required Records Doctrine did not apply in part because “[n]othing in the subpoena identifies the records sought as records required by the state’s agricultural statutes to be kept”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Coffey, Ripple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.